Evaluation
of the Canon EF 24mm f/1.4L USM Lens
50% MTF Performance Data
Link
to Methods Used
Corner Image Sharpness and Chromatic Aberration with EOS-1Ds
Image sharpness and lateral chromatic aberration (CA) varied among the lenses tested. Mild lateral chromatic aberration in the far corners of images is a common finding in wide angle lenses used with the EOS-1Ds. Examples below in the table are from the upper left corner of this chart. Comparison with the EF-S 10-22mm lens on the 20D is included mostly for my own reference database.
Aperture | EF 24mm f/1.4L | EF 24mm f/2.8 | EF 24-70mm f/2.8L | EF 17-40mm f/4L | EF-S 10-22mm f/4 20D @ 15mm |
Wide Open | f/1.4 Very soft |
f/2.8 Very soft |
f/2.8 Slightly soft |
f/4 Slightly soft |
f/4 Soft |
One Stop Closed | f/2 Soft |
f/4 Soft |
f/4 Sharp |
f/5.6 Sharp |
f/5.6 Soft |
Two Stops Closed | f/2.8 Soft |
f/5.6 Soft |
f/5.6 Sharp |
f/8 Very Sharp |
f/8 Slightly soft |
f/8 | f/8 Slightly soft Minimal CA |
f/8 Soft Mild CA |
f/8 Sharp Minimal CA |
f/8 Very Sharp Minimal CA |
f/8 Slightly soft Mild CA |
Center Image Sharpness with EOS-1Ds
Central image sharpness varied among the lenses tested. There was no central chromatic aberration. Examples below in the table are from the center of this chart.
Aperture | EF 24mm f/1.4L | EF 24mm f/2.8 | EF 24-70mm f/2.8L | EF 17-40mm f/4L | EF-S 10-22mm f/4 20D @ 15mm |
Wide Open | f/1.4 Slightly soft |
f/2.8 Slightly soft |
f/2.8 Slightly soft |
f/4 Sharp |
f/4 Slightly soft |
One Stop Closed | f/2 Sharp |
f/4 Slightly soft |
f/4 Sharp |
f/5.6 Sharp |
f/5.6 Slightly soft |
Two Stops Closed | f/2.8 Sharp |
f/5.6 Slightly soft |
f/5.6 Very Sharp |
f/8 Sharp |
f/8 Slightly soft |
f/8 | f/8 Very Sharp |
f/8 Sharp |
f/8 Very Sharp |
f/8 Sharp |
f/8 Slightly soft |
Linear Distortion at 24mm
EF 24mm f/1.4L | EF 24mm f/2.8 | EF 24-70mm f/2.8L | EF 17-40mm f/4L | EF-S 10-22mm f/4 20D @ 15mm |
none | none | mild barrel | minimal pincushion | mild pincushion |
Light Drop Off (Vignetting)
The lenses tested all have significant light drop off from the center when shot at wide-open aperture. The table summarizes how image field illumination evens as aperture is closed.
Aperture | EF 24mm f/1.4L | EF 24mm f/2.8 | EF 24-70mm f/2.8L | EF 17-40mm f/4L | EF 10-22mm f/4 20D @ 15mm |
Wide Open | f/1.4 Marked vignetting |
f/2.8 Marked vignetting |
f/2.8 Moderate vignetting |
f/4 Moderate vignetting |
f/4 Mild vignetting |
One Stop Closed | f/2 moderate |
f/4 moderate |
f/4 mild |
f/5.6 mild |
f/5.6 negligible |
Two Stops Closed | f/2.8 minimal |
f/5.6 mild |
f/5.6 negligible |
f/8 negligible |
f/8 negligible |
f/8 | f/8 negligible |
f/8 negligible |
f/8 negligible |
f/8 negligible |
f/8 negligible |
Conclusion
The EF 24mm f/1.4L lens offers generally excellent center of field lens sharpness from f/2 on and very acceptable performance at f/1.4 in image center if you need it. Edge performance is probably acceptable for most applications, especially if you can stop the lens down to f/8. This lens significantly outperforms the consumer EF 24mm f/2.8, but at a significantly higher price. The EF 24mm f/1.4L lens is an excellent lens. However, its performance doesn't quite match the stellar performance of the EF 35mm f/1.4L. If corner sharpness is important to you and you have enough light to stop your lens down to f/5.6 or f/8, a quality L-zoom (e.g., EF 17-40mm f/4L) outperforms the L-prime except for slight linear distortion.
©
2005, William L. Castleman
Initially
posted 7 April, 2005; revised 14 April 2005