Evaluation of the Canon EF 24mm f/1.4L USM Lens

I puchased and evaluated this expensive 24mm f/1.4L lens hoping that its performance would be significantly better than L-zoom lenses. It performs better than the EF 24mm f/2.8 consumer prime lens and gives good central image performance at f/2 and f/2.8. Corner sharpness is mediocre unless the lens is significantly stopped down.

50% MTF Performance Data
Link to Methods Used

Microcontrast performance of the EF 24mm f/1.4 L is excellent at f/2 and f/2.8. In the f/stop range commonly used for landscape and architectural photography, the L-prime offers no advantage over using an excellent L-zoom such as the EF 17-40mm f/4L. Corner sharpnes of the 17-40mm f/4 L is better than the 24mm f/1.4 L at f/8 (see below).

Corner Image Sharpness and Chromatic Aberration with EOS-1Ds

Image sharpness and lateral chromatic aberration (CA) varied among the lenses tested. Mild lateral chromatic aberration in the far corners of images is a common finding in wide angle lenses used with the EOS-1Ds. Examples below in the table are from the upper left corner of this chart. Comparison with the EF-S 10-22mm lens on the 20D is included mostly for my own reference database.

Aperture EF 24mm f/1.4L EF 24mm f/2.8 EF 24-70mm f/2.8L EF 17-40mm f/4L EF-S 10-22mm f/4
20D @ 15mm
Wide Open f/1.4
Very soft
f/2.8
Very soft
f/2.8
Slightly soft
f/4
Slightly soft
f/4
Soft
One Stop Closed f/2
Soft
f/4
Soft
f/4
Sharp
f/5.6
Sharp
f/5.6
Soft
Two Stops Closed f/2.8
Soft
f/5.6
Soft
f/5.6
Sharp
f/8
Very Sharp
f/8
Slightly soft
f/8 f/8
Slightly soft
Minimal CA
f/8
Soft
Mild CA
f/8
Sharp
Minimal CA
f/8
Very Sharp
Minimal CA
f/8
Slightly soft
Mild CA

Center Image Sharpness with EOS-1Ds

Central image sharpness varied among the lenses tested. There was no central chromatic aberration. Examples below in the table are from the center of this chart.

Aperture EF 24mm f/1.4L EF 24mm f/2.8 EF 24-70mm f/2.8L EF 17-40mm f/4L EF-S 10-22mm f/4
20D @ 15mm
Wide Open f/1.4
Slightly soft
f/2.8
Slightly soft
f/2.8
Slightly soft
f/4
Sharp
f/4
Slightly soft
One Stop Closed f/2
Sharp
f/4
Slightly soft
f/4
Sharp
f/5.6
Sharp
f/5.6
Slightly soft
Two Stops Closed f/2.8
Sharp
f/5.6
Slightly soft
f/5.6
Very Sharp
f/8
Sharp
f/8
Slightly soft
f/8 f/8
Very Sharp
f/8
Sharp
f/8
Very Sharp
f/8
Sharp
f/8
Slightly soft

Linear Distortion at 24mm

EF 24mm f/1.4L EF 24mm f/2.8 EF 24-70mm f/2.8L EF 17-40mm f/4L EF-S 10-22mm f/4
20D @ 15mm
none none mild barrel minimal pincushion mild pincushion

Light Drop Off (Vignetting)

The lenses tested all have significant light drop off from the center when shot at wide-open aperture. The table summarizes how image field illumination evens as aperture is closed.

Aperture EF 24mm f/1.4L EF 24mm f/2.8 EF 24-70mm f/2.8L EF 17-40mm f/4L EF 10-22mm f/4
20D @ 15mm
Wide Open f/1.4
Marked vignetting
f/2.8
Marked vignetting
f/2.8
Moderate vignetting
f/4
Moderate vignetting
f/4
Mild vignetting
One Stop Closed f/2
moderate
f/4
moderate
f/4
mild
f/5.6
mild
f/5.6
negligible
Two Stops Closed f/2.8
minimal
f/5.6
mild
f/5.6
negligible
f/8
negligible
f/8
negligible
f/8 f/8
negligible
f/8
negligible
f/8
negligible
f/8
negligible
f/8
negligible

Conclusion

The EF 24mm f/1.4L lens offers generally excellent center of field lens sharpness from f/2 on and very acceptable performance at f/1.4 in image center if you need it. Edge performance is probably acceptable for most applications, especially if you can stop the lens down to f/8. This lens significantly outperforms the consumer EF 24mm f/2.8, but at a significantly higher price. The EF 24mm f/1.4L lens is an excellent lens. However, its performance doesn't quite match the stellar performance of the EF 35mm f/1.4L. If corner sharpness is important to you and you have enough light to stop your lens down to f/5.6 or f/8, a quality L-zoom (e.g., EF 17-40mm f/4L) outperforms the L-prime except for slight linear distortion.

Equipment Review Index
Home

© 2005, William L. Castleman
Initially posted 7 April, 2005; revised 14 April 2005