Evaluation
of the Canon EF 28mm f/1.8 USM Lens
Resolution and 50% MTF Performance
Data
Link
to Methods Used
Light Drop Off (Vignetting)
The table summarizes how image field illumination evens as aperture is closed.
Aperture | EF 28mm f/1.8 | EF 24-70mm f/2.8L |
Wide Open | f/2 Moderate Vignetting |
f/2.8 Moderate Vignetting |
One Stop Closed | f/2.8 Mild Vignetting |
f/4 Minimal Vignetting |
Two Stops Closed | f/4 NegligibleVignetting |
f/5.6 NegligibleVignetting |
Corner Image Sharpness with EOS-1Ds Mark II
Aperture | EF 28mm f/1.8 | EF 24-70mm f/2.8L |
Wide Open | f/2 Soft |
f/2.8 Mildly soft |
One Stop Closed | f/2.8 Mildly soft |
f/4 Sharp |
Two Stops Closed | f/4 Slightly soft |
f/5.6 Sharp |
Center Image Sharpness with EOS-1Ds Mark II
Central image sharpness varied among the lenses tested. There was no central chromatic aberration. Examples below in the table are from the center of this chart.
Aperture | EF 28mm f/1.8 | EF 24-70mm f/2.8L |
Wide Open | f/2 Sharp |
f/2.8 Sharp |
One Stop Closed | f/2.8 Sharp |
f/4 Sharp |
Two Stops Closed | f/4 Sharp |
f/5.6 Sharp |
Linear Distortion
There is no appreciable linear distortion with the prime. The zoom has very mild barrel distortion at 28mm.
Image Sharpness Comparison of EF 28mm f/1.8 and EF 35mm 1.4L @ f/2.8
Aperture | EF 28mm f/1.8 @ f/2.8 EOS-1Ds Mark II |
EF 35mm f/1.4 L @ f/2.8 EOS-1Ds (Mark I) |
Center | Sharp | Sharp |
Corner | Slightly soft | Slightly soft |
Astrophotograph Comparison of EF
28mm f/1.8 and EF 35mm 1.4L @ f/2.8
Ektachrome 200; Camera
mounted on Kenko Skymemo tracking mount
Aperture | EF 28mm f/1.8 @ f/2 3 minutes |
EF 28mm f/1.8 @ f/2.8 5 minutes |
EF 28mm f/1.8 @ f/4 10 minutes |
EF 35mm f/1.4 L @ f/2.8 10 minutes |
Center | Slightly soft | Sharp | Sharp | Sharp |
Corner | Moderate spherical aberration and coma | Mild spherical aberration and coma | Mild spherical aberration | Slight far corner spherical aberration |
©
2005, William L. Castleman
Initially
posted 1 June, 2005, updated 12 June, 2005